CHANDRA SEN PANDEY v. SRI ASHWANI KUMAR GUPTA REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER IST GOMTI NAGAR LKO.
CAPL/3241/2025 · 2025-10-10
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195092 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195092 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3241 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that inadvertently, certain
facts and documents are left to be mentioned/enclosed along with the present contempt application which are necessary for proper adjudication of the present contempt application and prays for withdrawal of the same as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. As prayed, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the relevant documents to the
learned counsel for the applicants after retaining photocopy of the same. October 10, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anamika Rai, Ruchi Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Chandra Sen Pandey .....Applicant(s) Sri Ashwani Kumar Gupta Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Ist Gomti Nagar Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench