Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195068 (ALL)

MANSHA RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A483/949/2025 · 2025-11-14

Abdul Shahid

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 949 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard Sri Dharm Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nighashan, Lakhimpur Kheri for deciding the Final Report No. 29 of 2023 dated 29.6.2023 vide Criminal Case No. 44 of 2024 (Lakshminarayan & another Vs. Mansharam and others) within stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. has been filed by the opposite party no.2, on the basis of that application an FIR was registered on 6.5.2023 against the petitioners under Sections 147, 323, 394, 427, 452, 504, 506 IPC vide case crime no. 308 of 2023, Police Station Nighashan, District Kheri. After its complete investigation, a final report along with expunged report dated 7.5.2023 has been filed which is pending for disposal before the concerned trial court. It is also observed that the proceeding under Section 182 Cr.P.C. should be initiated against the complainant of the case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that despite information to the complainant, the said final report is still pending for final adjudication. It is causing irreparable loss and injury to the petitioners. The petitioners have not committed any offence. The final Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharm Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mansha Ram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) report has been filed, after due investigation. It is also recommended that proceeding be initiated under Section 182 Cr.P.C. against the complainant of the case. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposed the petition contending that the learned trial court would act, in accordance with law. 6. After consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. and in view of the entire matter in question, learned Magistrate is hereby directed to decide Final Report No. 29 of 2023 dated 29.6.2023 vide Criminal Case No. 44 of 2024 (Lakshminarayan & another Vs. Mansharam and others) as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one month from the date production of a certified copy of this order. 7. With these directions, the petition is finally disposed of. November 14, 2025 M. Tarik A483 No. 949 of 2025 2 (Abdul Shahid,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD TARIK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench