HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6193 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Jeet Prakash Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shiv Nath Goswami, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. and Sri Shikhar Anand, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of State Public Services Tribunal. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the State Public Services Tribunal, U.P. Lucknow to decide Claim Petition No.1040 of 2024: Raj Kumar Vs. State of U.P. expeditiously. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has challenged the validity of an order dismissing him from service, pleadings already stands completed therefore the petitioner is suffering due to delay in disposal of the proceedings. 4. The learned counsel representing the State Public Services Tribunal states that there was a huge vacancy of Members in Tribunal which was causing delay in disposal of the proceedings earlier, but now the Tribunal is functioning with full strength and now the cases will be decided expeditiously. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and a direction is issued Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Nath Goswami, Rajiv Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shikhar Anand Raj Kumar Pno No.112542577 .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) to State Public Services Tribunal, U.P. Lucknow to decide Claim Petition No.1040 of 2024: Raj Kumar Vs. State of U.P. expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties and try to conclude the same at the earliest. October 28, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 6193 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench