HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12256 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 21, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Nath Tilhari, Mukesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Kumar Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sanjay Toppo .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Secondary Edu.Deptt.Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench