Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19504 (AP)

P VENKATESWARA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13410/2025 · 2025-05-14

K Suresh Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Vi IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATIv^ (Special Original Jurisdiction)^/ THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 13410 OF 2025 O /A, Or P. C>! ★ Between: 1. P Venkateswara Prasad, S/o Late P Krishna Murthy, Aged about 65 D.No. 11-1-370, Aravind Nagar, Anantapuramu town, Anantapuramu District. 2. P Srinivasa Yjupta, S/o Late P Krishna Murthy, Aged about 64 years town years I D.No. 28-3-147, Tarakanath Colony, Anantapuramu Anantapuramu District. ...PETITIONE#r" AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, H^r^ Department Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P. 2. The District Collector, Anantapuramu Town Anantapuramu District, 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapuramu Rural Anantapuramu District 4. The Tahsildar, Anantapuramu Rural Anantapuramu District 5. The Mandal Surveyor, Tahsildar Office, Anantapuramu Rural, Anantapuramu District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare tfve action of respondents especially the Respondent No. 4 and 5 herein in interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners property to an extent of Ac. 1.6387 cents and Ac. 1.8613 cents respectively in Sy No. 242 located in Kakkalapalle Village, Anantapuramu District, and threatening to Anantapuramu Rural, dispossess the petitioners from the property as being arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 and 5 not to interfere wjth the day to day activities pertaining to petitioners property over Ac. 1.6387 cents and Ac. 1.8613 cents respectively in Sy No. 242 of Kakkalapalle Village, Anantapuramu rural, , Anantapuramu District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 not to interfere in any manner with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property over Ac. 1.6387 cents and Ac. 1.8613 cents respectively in Sy Kakkalapalle Anantapuramu Rural,Anantapuramu District without following due process of law in the interest of justice. Village, No.242 located in Counsel for the Petitloner(s): SRI. AYESHA AZMA S v Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE v The Courtmade the following:ORDER •_ V APHC010274122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 13410/2025 Between: P Venkateswara Prasad and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.AYESHAAZMAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: ...RESPONDENT{S) Seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 & 5 in interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners’ property, to an extent of Ac.1.6387 cents and Ac.1.8613 cents, in Sy.No.242, of Kakkalapalle Village, Anantapuramu Rural, Anantapuramu District as illegal, the present Petition is filed. 2 f Today, when the matter is taken up, the Learned Government Pleader for Revenue has produced the Written Instructions furnished by the 4*^ respondent, wherein it was stated as under;- 2. “It is submitted that, no steps have been taken to dispossess the petitioners from the above said land as alleged by the petitioners in the Writ Petition. ” Accordingly, while placing the above said written instructions record, the Writ Petition is closed, as no orders are required to be passed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to avail appropriate remedies, in case, the respondents initiate any action in future. No order as to costs. 3. on Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P. 2. The District Collector, Anantapuramu Town Anantapuramu District, 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapuramu Rural Anantapuramu District 4 The Tahsildar, AnantapuramuRural Anantapuramu District 5. The Mandal Surveyor, Tahsildar Office, Anantapuramu Rural, Anantapuramu District. 6. OneCCto Sri. Ayesha Azma S Advoc'ate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP For Hom'^High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Two CCs to GP for Reventie, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]. 9. Three CD Copies AL HIGH COURT DATED: 15/05/2025 ORDER f 16 MAY 2025 | Current Section . WP.No.13410of 2025 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS