HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10802 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. P.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, advocate, holding brief of Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and Mr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. Mr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 submits that order dated 27.05.2025 has been withdrawn and in-compliance thereof, an order was passed on 07.11.2025 while allowing the petitioner to join on 07.11.2025 at 11:00 am. He submitted that now the present petition has become infructuous as it has lost its efficacy. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid contentions. In view of the above, the present petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Consigned to the records. Needless to say that if the petitioner is allowed to work, he shall be paid salary November 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey, Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, Uday Veer Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Hari Govind Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench