1 2025:CGHC:45498 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2893 of 2020 1 - Smt. Meena Ekka W/o Shri Prashant Khalkho Aged About 32 Years Occupation- Service As A.N.M. Cum.Health Centre, Sitapur Presently Under Training Of B.Sc. Nursing At Govt. Nursing College Bilaspur, R/o Katnipara, Sitapur P.S. - Sitapur, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Atalnagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Of Surguja Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - The C.M.O. Ambikapur, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - The B.M.O. Cum Health Centre Sitapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For State/Respondent/s : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.09.11 11:54:20 +0530 2 08/09/2025 1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s): “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the transfer order dated 23.08.2019 related to petitioner passed by the respondent No.1 (Annexure P/1). 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court further may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to give the salary immediately. 10.3. That, any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of this case, may also be granted to the petitioner.” 2. Since on previous two dates of hearing, none appeared for the petitioner nor was represented through counsel. Today also, despite repeated calls, neither petitioner appeared nor is represented by any counsel. Further, the issue pertains to the transfer order passed in the year 2019 and there is no stay granted in favour of the petitioner. 3. Having considered aforesaid facts of the case, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution as also on the ground of having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi