Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19501 (CAL)

MANOTOSH RUDRA v. THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT CALCUTTA AND ORS.

WPA/9173/2024 · 2025-09-03

Amrita Sinha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3RD Sept.,2025 Item no.D/L 14 Court No. 14 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 9173 of 2024 In the matter of : Manotosh Rudra …. Petitioner VS. The City Civil Court at Calcutta & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Pritam Choudhury ….Advocate For the State: Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, Ld. AGP Mr. Sourav Choudhury ….Advocates 1. Perused the report of the Registrar, City Civil Court dated 20th August, 2025. 2. It appears therefrom that the Registrar, City Civil Court received the photocopy of the petitions except the Misc. Case no. 3306 of 2001, summons and advocate’s letter from the learned advocate of the writ petitioner but no document from the other parties and the arbitrator has been made available. The documents submitted by the petitioner are also not affirmed documents. 3. The Registrar has prayed for direction to reconstruct the case records by obtaining records from the learned Bench- II and learned Bench-VIII of City Civil Court from the available unauthenticated copies of the documents so received. Page 2 4. The Registrar is permitted to take necessary steps in the matter for reconstruction, if possible, in accordance with law. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)