SUBHAS BABUAPPA KSHIRSAGAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH CHIEF REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
WP/7220/2022 · 2025-02-27
Shri S G Mehare, Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19501 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19501 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 937.WP-7220-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7220 OF 2022 SUBHAS BABUAPPA KSHIRSAGAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH CHIEF REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Adkine Sonaji K. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.R. Yadav Lonikar Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. P.N. Kutti h/f Mrs. Kutti Chaudhari Chaitali R. ...
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE AND
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 27th FEBRUARY 2025 PER COURT :
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2. The award was passed in 1964. The petitioner has a case that the compensation amount was not paid to him. However the letter from the office of the Public Information Officer cum Registrar District Court, Parbhani dated 23.09.2021 reveals that the compensation amount was paid on 26.08.1964. It is a concrete evidence based upon the record maintained by the District Court. It is the duty of the petitioner to find out whom the payment has been made but instead of going to the District Court to verify the fact he is questioning before the Court whom that amount is paid ? 2025:BHC-AUG:5786-DB
2 937.WP-7220-2022.doc
3. Prima facie evidence is available showing that the amount of compensation has been paid long back. We do not find substance in the petition. Hence, the petition stands dismissed.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ S. G. MEHARE, J.] NAJEEB..