Omkar Nath Dubey v. State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS
CRLR/325/2013 · 2025-03-07
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1950 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1950 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
CRLR No.325 of 2013 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Girish Chandra Lakhchaura, Advocate for the revisionist, through video conferencing.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State.
3. There is no representation for the private respondents.
4. Vide order dated 21.10.2024, learned counsel for the revisionists was granted ten days’ time to serve upon the un-served respondents and the matter was directed to be listed on 23.12.2024.
5. From the record, it transpires that no steps have been taken by learned counsel for the revisionists.
6. Learned counsel for the revisionists submitted that he has got no instructions and nobody is turning up.
7. Accordingly criminal revision is dismissed for non compliance of the order dated 23.12.2024.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
07.03.2025 SK