HARISH CHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/309/2025 · 2025-10-28
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194967 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194967 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 309 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. It is argued by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the trial has already been concluded and as such, the bail application is rendered infructuous.
2. It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. October 28, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh K. Tripathi, Aditya Kumar, Anita, Shailendra Kr Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Harish Chandra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench