Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194964 (MAD)

Ravi @ Ravi Shankar v. State rep by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/28442/2025 · 2025-10-17

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.28442 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.28442 of 2025 Ravi @ Ravi Shankar ... Petitioners Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Vellore North Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. Crime No.305 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.305 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.Vinodh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) O R D E R 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.28442 of 2025 The petitioners herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(3) of Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police Laws Act, 1930 ( Amendment 2021) read with Section 318(4) of BNS (420 of IPC) in Crime No.305 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner joining hands with other accused involved in gambling activities and cheated the defacto complainant. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that, apart from this case, petitioner has 6 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.28442 of 2025 previous cases. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 17.10.2025 sma K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.28442 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Vellore North Police Station, Vellore, Vellore District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.O.P.No.28442 of 2025 17.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis