- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3817-DB CCC No. 292 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CCC NO. 292 OF 2024 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RAMA R. REDDY W/O SRI M. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 2. SMT. R. SHASHIKALA W/O SRI M. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS BOTH COMPLAINANTS RESIDING AT No. 835 6TH MAIN ROAD, 10TH C CROSS WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALALKSHMIPURAM 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 086 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI CHETAN KUMAR H, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI G.K. MANJUNATH SON OF LATE H.G. KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 557 20TH CROSS ROAD JNANABHARATHI LAYOUT PHASE II Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3817-DB CCC No. 292 of 2024 MARIYAPPANAPALYA BANGALORE - 560 056 …ACCUSED (BY SRI AMIT M. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO INITIATE APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HIS WILLFUL BREACH OF UNDERTAKING BY WAY OF AN AFFIDAVIT DATED 21.12.2022 (ANNEXURE-C) GIVEN TO THIS HON'BLE COURT IN PURSUANCE OF ORDER DATED 14.12.2022 PASSED IN R.F.A. NO.2054/2022 (ANNEXURE-A) & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) The directions in order dated 14.12.2022 included handing over of possession by the appellant to the respondents and also regarding payment of monthly rent. 2. When the present petition came up for consideration today, it was not in dispute that the rent was paid and the arrears are also paid. As far as possession of the premises is concerned, the possession is admittedly with the complainants herein. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3817-DB CCC No. 292 of 2024 3. The argument rivally sought to be raised is as to whether the respondent handed over the possession and the keys voluntarily, or that possession was taken over by the complainants on their own, is a submission in the nature of a word against word. 4. When the possession is already with the complainants, the contempt stands purged. The Court is not inclined to go into any other factual aspect. 5. The contempt proceedings are closed and disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30