Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19495 (JHR)

MS INDIAN STEEL AND WIRE PRODUCTS LIMITED v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./644/2024 · 2025-03-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 644 of 2024 ------ M/s Indian Steel & Wire Products Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act of 1956, having its works at Indranagar, Jamshedpur, P.S. & P.O.-JEMCO & Dist.-East Singhbhum, represented through its company Secretary, Shir Rabi Narayan Kar, aged about 47 years, s./o Sri Rajani Kant Kar, resident of G-4/4, ISWP Colony, Indranagar, P.O. & P.S.- Telco, Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singbhum … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Labour Employment and Training, Government of Jharkhand, Office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi 3. Employees State Insurance Corporation, represented through its Regional Director, having office at Namkum, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, Dist.-Ranchi … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Ravi Kerketta, SC VI : Ms. Ruby Pandey, AC to SC VI : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Advocate ------ Order No.03 Dated- 07.03.2025 Heard the parties. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of W.P. (C) No. 3314 of 2021 to its original file. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P. (C) No. 3314 of 2021 was dismissed for non-prosecution. It is then submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as the counsel was ill therefore, he left the Court early to consult a doctor and hence, the counsel for the petitioner could not appear before this Court when the case was called out and the same resulted in dismissal of W.P. (C) No. 3314 of 2021. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P. (C) No. 3314 of 2021 and unless W.P. (C) No. 3314 of 2021 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P. (C) No. 3314 of 2021 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P. (C) No. 3314 of 2021 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List W.P. (C) No. 3314 of 2021 under the appropriate heading after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/