Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194949 (MAD)

B.SURYAKANTHAM v. P.N.S.RAJESWARA RAO

A/5383/2025 · 2025-11-12

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 5383 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA A No. 5383 of 2025 in C.S.No.399 of 2012 1. B.Suryakantham No.5/4, Arulammbal St., Ch-17 and 4 Others 2.P.N.S.Chandra Sekhara Rao No.63, Malayaperumal St., Ch-1 3.R.Venkatalakshmi S-2, Manikanta Enclave, 86-5-2-10, J.N.Rd., Rajahmundry-533 103 4.A.Sesha Rathanam F-3, Sri Lakshmi Sai Towers, Av.Appa Rao Rd., Rajahmundry-533 105 5.P.N.S.Venkkateswara Rao No.63, Malayaperumal St., Ch-1 Applicant(s) Vs 1. P.N.S.Rajeswara Rao No.303, Gokulam Residency, Jayanagar, (near Bhagya Nagar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5383 of 2025 Colony), Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500 072 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Application is filed to reopen the Plaintiff side further evidence for examination of the 3rd Plaintiff Mrs.R.Venkatalakshmi as PW2 in the above suit. For Applicant(s): Ms.C.Jaya Chithra For Respondent: Mr.JRK Bhavanandham ORDER This application has been filed to reopen the plaintiff's side further evidence for examination of the third plaintiff as P.W.2 in the above suit. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to file counter. 3. It appears that the evidence has already been closed and the matter is ripe for arguments. At this stage, the applicants / plaintiffs have come out with this application to reopen their evidence for the purpose of examining the third plaintiff as P.W.2. Since this delayed initiative taken by the applicants / plaintiffs causes unnecessary delay and inconvenience to the respondent / defendant, I feel this application may allowed on the condition that the applicant shall pay a sum of Rs.1,500/- as cost to the respondent / defendant. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5383 of 2025 4. The learned counsel for the applicants / defendants paid a sum of Rs.1,500/- directly to the learned counsel for the respondent who is present in the Court. The learned counsel for the respondent has also acknowledged the same. 5. Since the cost is paid directly to the learned counsel for the respondent / defendant by the learned counsel for the applicants / plaintiffs, this application is allowed. 12-11-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5383 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 5383 of 2025 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn A No. 5383 of 2025 In C.S.No.399 of 2012 12-11-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis