Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194947 (ALL)

HARI RAM SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MAHILA KALYAM U.P. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/4293/2023 · 2025-12-08

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4293 of 2023 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Petition had earlier been filed seeking following main prayer:- I. Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 07-7-2021 passed by Director of Mahila Kalyan Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Opposite party no. 2 to this writ petition as contained in Annexure No.4 to this Writ Petition. II. Issue a Writ, Order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to grant the pension and other retirement benefit to the petitioner counting the services rendered on ad-hoc basis by the petitioner for the purposes of computation of qualifying services for grant of pension and other retiral benefit and to pass appropriate order for payment of full pension and other consequential benefits within period specified by this Hon'ble Court. Application has been filed seeking withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file afresh in view of fact that order dated 13.09.2020 could not be challenged. In view of averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. December 8, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Nauman, Anamika Tiwari, Vijay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Hari Ram Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Mahila Kalyam U.P. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench