Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194938 (MAD)

S.SENTHIL KUMAR v. TAMIL NADU GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY AND

WP/45440/2025 · 2025-11-24

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.45440 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.45440 of 2025 S.Senthil Kumar : Petitioner Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Generation of Electricity and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO), Represented by its Chairman and Managing Director, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 2.The Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Superintending Engineer, CEDC/South/Coimbatore-12. 4.The Executive Engineer (Distribution/Palladam) Tirupur Electricity and Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Palladam, Tirupur District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.45440 of 2025 file of the second respondent in connection with his proceedings MS No.123 dated 17.05.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service and grant all the service and monetary benefits to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramkumar Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of compulsory retirement passed by the second respondent dated 17.05.2025. 2. Though the petitioner filed this writ petition, he also filed an appeal as against the order passed by the second respondent before the first respondent and it is pending. Therefore, when the petitioner filed appeal before the first respondent and while pendency of the said appeal, the petitioner cannot simultaneously challenge the order passed by the second respondent before this Court by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the writ petition is devoid of merits and not maintainable. Hence, it is dismissed. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.45440 of 2025 3. The first respondent is directed to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and counter parties, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 24.11.2025 Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mrn To 1.Tamil Nadu Generation of Electricity and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO), Represented by its Chairman and Managing Director, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 2.The Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Superintending Engineer, CEDC/South/Coimbatore-12. 4.The Executive Engineer (Distribution/Palladam) Tirupur Electricity and Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.45440 of 2025 Palladam, Tirupur District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.45440 of 2025 G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN , J. (mrn) W.P.No.45440 of 2025 24.11.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis