SMT. RAM PYARI v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY. REVENUE LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIC/9167/2021 · 2025-10-27
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194937 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194937 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9167 of 2021 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. The present writ petition has been appearing under the heading of
"Priority Cases".
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the State-respondents.
4. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that no cause of action survives, and accordingly, the matter is consigned to record.
5. The writ petition is disposed of.
6. In the event, the petitioner is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law.
October 27, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Gyan Swaroop Srivastava, Kshemendra Shukla, Rishi Raj, Samarth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt. Ram Pyari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy. Revenue Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench