MOOL CHAND v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. (IRRIGATION WATER RESOURCE) LKO. AND 2 OTHER
WRIA/11991/2025 · 2025-10-10
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194921 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194921 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11991 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief:-
"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider the petitioner for second and third Assured Career Progression (ACP) in the light of G.O. dated 05.11.2014 as contained in Annexure No.5 to this writ petition with all consequential benefits of pay and allowances, including arrears of difference of salary."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Superintending Engineer (Monitoring Cell) Sinchai Bhawan, Cantt Road, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 10, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya), Sonal Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Mool Chand .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. (Irrigation Water Resource) Lko. And 2 Other .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench