RAJ KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9994/2025 · 2025-10-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9994 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Short counter affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Pawan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.436 of 2025, under Section 65(1), 351(3) BNS & Section 4(2) of POCSO Act, P.S. Kotwali Sadar, District Kheri.
4. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that the applicant who is father of the victim had committed wrong on her. Similar allegations were given under Section 180 & 183 BNSS. Medical does not corroborate the allegation. Counsel for the applicant argues that there is a matrimonial dispute in between the applicant and his wife.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the aforesaid, prima-facie, the allegations are highly improbable and the medical does not corroborate the allegation, as such, the applicant, who is in custody since 24.05.2025 and has no criminal antecedent, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Agnihotri Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raj Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Let the applicant Raj Kumar Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 17, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9994 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench