Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194917 (ALL)

SUMAN MAURYA (WOMEN CONSTABLE , PNO-192623706) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13526/2025 · 2025-11-21

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13526 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to consider petitioner for transfer to Lucknow on compassionate ground in view of serious ailment of petitioner's mother-in-law. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Inspector General of Police (Establishment), D.G.P. Headquarter, U.P., Lucknow - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 21, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Suman Maurya (Women Constable , Pno-192623706) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench