HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14980 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Satyanshu Ojha, Advocate on behalf of opposite parties no. 2 & 3 is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Neelesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the State, Sri Satyanshu Ojha, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 and perused the records. 3. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs :- "i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the arrears of differences of minimum of regular pay scale for Class IV post .w.e.f. 01.01.2016 as per 7th Pay Commission report to petitioner reducing the amount already paid to him. ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay arrears of minimum of pay scale as per the recommendation of 6th Pay Commission from the date of its implementation, till the date of implementation of 7th Pay Commission i.e. till 01.01.2016, after reducing the amount already paid to the petitioner." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the controversy in the instant writ petition has already been settled up to Apex Court, therefore, the grievance of the petitioner may be redressed. He has further prayed that the appropriate decision maybe taken by the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Vice Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya. Therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neelesh Kumar Yadav, Abhaya Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh, Satyanshu Ojha Sharafat Ullah .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agri. Edu. Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. 5. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. 6. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Vice Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya taking all his pleas, grounds, aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. 7. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. 8. Writ petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14980 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench