SATIRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/9707/2025 · 2025-10-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194915 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194915 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9707 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.386 of 2025, under Section 105 BNS, P.S. Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that the husband of the informant was working at a brickkiln and left home around 9 PM. On the way, the accused persons had surrounded their agricultural field with wire in which electricity was running and the husband of the informant came in contact with the same and subsequently died.
4. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no specific allegation against the applicant has been levelled so as to implicate him for an offence under Section 105 BNS. He further denies that the applicant had electrified his agricultural fields with fence.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Irrespective of the aforesaid, the fact remains that the applicant is aged about 60 years and is in custody since 29.08.2025 having no criminal antecedent and there being no specific allegation to implicate him under Section 105 BNS, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jyotinjay Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satiram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Let the applicant Satiram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9707 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench