Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194895 (MAD)

Tata Capital Ltd v. Selvan A

Arb Appln/1527/2025 · 2025-12-15

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arbitration Application No.1527 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Arbitration Application No.1527 of 2025 Tata Capital Limited, by its Associate Legal Remedial, R.Kamalakkannan, Having its office at 1st Floor, Centennial Square, 6A-Dr Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024. Applicant Vs Selvan A Respondent Arbitration Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules r/w Section 9 (ii) (b) (d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint Mr.Abish DJ currently designated as Legal Manager, in the Applicant company having his office First Floor, Centennial Square, Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 024 as Receiver to seize and deliver the Asset Category Excavator DOZCO YANMAR VI030 6B MINI EXC bearing Engine No.BH058 Chassis No.1080242265, Reg.No.NA situated at No.5 11 A Kadampadi Vilagam Colony, Thidal Thovalai Post, near Kovil, Kanyakumari 629 851 or wherever it is found more fully described 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1527 of 2025 hereunder with police aid or break open the premises from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant. For Applicant : Mr.N.K.Vanan ***** ORDER This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [for brevity 'the Act'] for appointment of a receiver to seize and deliver the vehicle to the applicant, if required, with police aid. 2. The applicant extended financial facilities to the respondent. Since the respondent committed default, a recall notice dated 12.08.2025 was issued and in spite of receipt of the same, there was no response from respondent. It is under these circumstances, the present petition came to be filed before this Court. 3. When the application came up for hearing on 21.11.2025, this Court issued notice to respondent. 4. Private notice has been served on the respondent and affidavit of service has also been filed. The name of respondent has also been printed in the cause list. However, the respondent is neither present nor 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1527 of 2025 represented through counsel. Hence, the apprehension raised on the side of the applicant that the respondent is trying to secret the vehicle is prima facie established. 5. In view of the above, Mr.Abish DJ, Legal Manager, is appointed as the Court receiver and the Court receiver is permitted to seize the vehicle from the respondent or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required with police assistance. This application stands disposed of in the above terms. 15.12.2025 NCC:Yes/No gm N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. gm 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arbitration Application No.1527 of 2025 Arbitration Application No.1527 of 2025 15.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis