Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19489 (ALL)

SMT. ANAR KALI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/4582/2025 · 2025-02-17

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22945 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4582 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Anar Kali Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10.12.2024 and cancel the Board Examination Centre allotted in favour of respondent no.4 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. ii. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the present case. iii. Award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner." 3. The petitioner is complainant and she is not aggrieved by the allotment of Board Examination Centre in favour respondent no.4 as none of the rights of the petitioner is prejudiced by the allotment of the centre. 4. In such view of the fact, the petitioner has no locus standi to file the present writ petition. 5. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad