Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19488 (CHH)

RAJESH JYUSHTIN TOPPO v. SMT. RESHMA KUJUR

MCC/488/2024 · 2025-01-10

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:1602-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 488 of 2024 Rajesh Jyushtin Toppo, S/o Lt. Shri Umeshchand Prasad Toppo, Aged About 48 Years, Profession Private Job, Caste, Orao, R/o Village Shivnandanpur, (Behind Vivekanand School) Tehsil Visrampur, P.S. Visrampur District Surajpur Chhttisgarh. ... Applicant versus Smt. Reshma Kujur, D/o Shri Ramchandra Kujur, Aged About 29 Years, Profession Govt. Job, R/o. Village Jigdi Basen, P.S. Pasta, Tehsil Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. Presently Residing, Village Amdi (At Residence Of Shri Arvind Beck) P.S. Dhaorpur, Tehsil Lundra, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Amit Xalxo, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Neeraj Mehta, Advocate. D.B. : Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 10.01.2025 2 1. Heard on I.A. No.01/2024, an application for condonation of delay of 13 days in filing of this petition. No reply has been filed with regard to the said application. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, which is duly supported by an affidavit, we are inclined to allow the same. 3. The application (I.A. No.01/2024) is allowed and delay in filing of this petition is, accordingly, condoned. 4. Also heard on admission. 5. This petition has been filed for restoration of FA (MAT) No.142/2022, which was dismissed in default vide order dated 19.03.2024. 6. For the reasons assigned in the application for restoration of the said appeal, which is duly supported by the affidavit, we are inclined to allow the same. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed and appeal being FA(MAT) No.142/2022 is directed to be restored is its original number. No order as to costs. Sd/-Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Arpan