- 1 - ca6816.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6816 OF 2025 IN WPST/32996/2024 Bajaj Auto Ltd Bajaj Nagar ….Applicant VERSUS Lahu Hanumantrao Shewale …..Respondent Mr. S. V. Dankh, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2025. PER COURT : 1. Perused the Application. Heard learned counsel for Applicant. 2. Learned counsel for Applicant submits that Writ Petition was dismissed for non-removal of office objections and on that stage no notice was issued to the Respondent. He, therefore, seeks dispensation of notice to Respondent. Since the notice of the Petition was not issued to the Respondent, notice of this Application stands dispensed with. 3. Application and the reasons mentioned therein indicate that delay caused in preferring the Application is satisfactorily explained. - 2 - ca6816.25.odt For the reasons mentioned in the Application, Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘a’ to ‘d’. 4. Learned counsel for Applicant undertakes to remove office objections within a period of four weeks. In failure thereof, the Petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. ( R. M. JOSHI) Judge dyb