Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6155 WP No. 41483 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO.41483 OF 2017 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. T. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O SRI. GIRIYAPPA, WORKING AS GROUP-D EMPLOYEE, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, MATHRU MANDALI HIGH SCHOOL, V.V. MOHALLA, MYSORE-570 002.
R/AT NO.2418, 8TH CROSS, KAILASAPURA, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570 021. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.P. SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, PRIMARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION, NEW PUBLIC OFFICES, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001. Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6155 WP No. 41483 of 2017
3.
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS SECONDARY EDUCATION, NEW PUBLIC OFFICES, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, K.R. CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001.
4.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE - 570 002.
5.
THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, NORTH RANGE, MYSORE - 570 002
6.
MATHRU MANDALI, V.V. MOHALLA, MYSORE-570 002.
REP. BY SECRETARY VIJAYALAKSHMI.
7.
SRI. NAGESH, D GROUP EMPLOYEE IN ALKABIR HIGH SCHOOL, BANNIMANTAP, MYSORE - 570 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRATHIBHA R.K., AGA FOR R1 TO R5;
R6 IS SERVED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE SEC. 98(2) OF THE KARNATAKA EDUCATION ACT, 1983 AT ANNEXURE-J1 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6155 WP No. 41483 of 2017 ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri. M.P.Srikanth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Prathibha.R.K., learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 5. Perused the writ petition papers.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare Section 98(2) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (for short '1983 Act') vide Annexure-J1 as unconstitutional and also to declare Rule 11(6) of Karnataka Educational Institutions (Recruitment and Terms and Conditions of Services of Employees in Private Aided Primary and Secondary Educational Institutions) Rules, 1999 (for short '1999 Rules') vide Annexure-J as unconstitutional and also violative of the parent Act along with prayer to quash the
Order dated 16.08.2017 bearing No.f1/100342/ºÉ.².ªÀUÁð/78/2017-18 at Annexure-H.
3. Under Annexure-H, it is seen that excess teacher in the aided school for the Academic Year, 2017-18 is
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:6155 WP No. 41483 of 2017 re-allotted to the 6th respondent-Institution i.e., respondent No.7.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate on instructions submit that the petitioner has retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 29.02.2020 and it is also submitted that even respondent No.7 has also retired.
5. In view of the above circumstances, no purpose would be served in considering the prayer of questioning validity of particular provisions of 1983 Act and 1999 Rules. Moreover, posting of respondent No.7 to respondent No.6- Institution under Annexure-H would have no consequence since the petitioner as well as respondent No.7 have retired as on this day. In view of the above circumstances, writ petition is
disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14