HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7471 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Atul Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Naveen, District - Gonda, to decide Case No. 713 - Parasnath Vs. Badlu Singh, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Naveen, District - Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Naveen, District - Gonda, is directed to decide Case No. 713 - Parasnath Vs. Badlu Singh, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar Pathak, Chandan Tiwari, Shivam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Alok Mathur,J.) Shri Kant Singh .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Naveen, Gonda And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench