SHIPRA SINGH RAJPUT (WOMEN CONSTABLE , PNO-192443731) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/12421/2025 · 2025-10-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12421 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 16.11.2024 whereby petitioner's representation seeking transfer from district Kaushambi to UP-112 District Etah has been rejected.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in the impugned order itself, it has been provided in paragraph - 6 that in case petitioner's husband is transferred elsewhere from 43rd Division PAC, Etah, petitioner's fresh representation would be considered.
4. It has been admitted by learned counsel for petitioner, on the basis of instructions, that aforesaid condition has not yet been fulfilled. Even otherwise, it is evident that petition has been filed filed after one year of passing of impugned order pertaining to transfer. It is therefore Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shipra Singh Rajput (Women Constable , Pno- 192443731) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
provided that in case condition indicated in paragraph - 6 of impugned order dated 16.11.2024 is fulfilled, petitioner shall have a right for submitting a representation as indicated in paragraph - 6 of impugned
order.
5. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition stands
disposed of. October 17, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 12421 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench