SAKSHI SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. / PRIN. SECY. TECH. EDU. DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/13203/2025 · 2025-11-14
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194846 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194846 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13203 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Lalit Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 & 5, Mr. Anagh Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, Mr R.S. Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties to grant maternity benefit and to pay Rs. 3,46,200 (Rs.57,700x6) on account of salary for that period i.e. 11.09.2023 to 10.03.2024 along with interest." Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has made several representation for grant of maternity benefit and payment of Rs.3,46,200 (Rs.57,700x6) on account of salary for the period 11.9.2023 to
10.3.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamta Prasad Srivastava, Anshuman Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Atul Kumar Dwivedi, Lalit Kumar Tiwari Sakshi Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Tech. Edu. Deptt. Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.3/Director, Institute of Engineering & Technology, Sitapur Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, with speaking and reasoned order, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 14, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13203 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench