1 2025:CGHC:20195 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 415 of 2025  Manish Kumar Singh S/o Uday Pratap Aged About 45 Years R/o H.No. 480, Kanhaiyapuri, Kasardih, Durg District- Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Union Of India Through The Recovery Office Debt Recovery Tribunal Jabalpur 797/ii, Shantikunj, South Civil Lines, Jabalpur (M.P.) 2. Uco Bank Zonal Office, Chhattisgarh Eye Hospital Campus, 1st Floor, Telibandha Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Branch Manager Punjab National Bank, Borsi Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, CGC For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 02-05-2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 – Bank submits that if petitioner moves an application for one-time settlement within period of three days, same would be decided by the Bank within further period of 15 days. 2) At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for three days 2 time to make a representation before the respondent No. 2 – Bank. 3) Heard. 4) Taking into consideration the submissions made hereinabove, this petition is hereby being disposed of directing the petitioner to prefer a representation within period of three days from today before the respondent No. 2 – Bank, who in turn is directed to decide the same taking sympathetic view within further period of 15 days. 5) With the aforesaid direction(s), instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya