APHC010273472010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADE AT AMARAVATI SMB wm -O' MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUCY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA CRIMINAL REVISION CASF on.n Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 passed in C.C.No.75/2002 ^ Magistrate, Tanuku, dated 09.10.2009. Between: J. V RAO of Cr.P.C, against the Judgment on the file of the II Additional Judicial First Class Karri Venkata Lakshmi, W/o Satyanarayana Reddy Inaparru, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari , Aged 44 years, R/o District. ...Petitioner/De-facto Complainant AND 1. Karri Venkata Reddy, S/o. Sathi Reddy, Aged about 42 years, R/o. J District. Inaparru Village, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari 2. Dwarampudi Subbi Reddy, S/o Rami Reddy, Aged about 48 years, R/o Inaparru Village, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 3. Sathi Venkata Reddy, S/o Somi Reddy, Aged about 48 years, R/o Inaparru Village, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari District 4. Sathi Bhaskara Reddy, S/o Gangi Reddy, Aged about 40 years, R/o Inaparru Village, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 5, Velagala Chani Rami Reddy, S/o Lakshmana Reddy, Aged about 42 Mandal, West Godavari years, R/o Inaparru Village, Iragavaram District. M% 6. Sathi Govinda Reddy, S/o Krishna Reddy, Aged Inaparru Village, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari 7. Tetali Veera Reddy, S/o Gavir Reddy, Aged Inaparru Village, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari 8. Sathi Lacha Reddy, S/o Sambaiah, Aged about Village, Iragavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. about 53 years, R/o District. about 43 years,- R/o District. 78 years, R/o Inaparru Q . X A .. -Respondents/Accused ■ The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Sub-Inspector of Police, Iragavaram Police Station, West Godavari District Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. Represented by its ...Respondent/Complainant Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 8: None Appeared Counsel for Respondent No.9 The Court made the following order: Counsel for the Petitioner : Public Prosecutor APHC010273472010 N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 35/?nin HMH [3369] ■J3>5 RAO Between: I.I^RRI VENKATA LAKSHMI, W/0 SATYANARAYANA R/0 INAPARRU, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL REDDY, W.G.DIST. ...PETITIONER AND ^ ^^NKATA REDDY 8 OTHERS, S/0 SATHI REDDY R/O 9 village, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, W.G.DIST. 2.DWARAMPUDI SUBBI REDDY, S/0 RAMI REDDY Q village, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, W.G.DIST ’ VENKATA'REDDY, S/0 SOMI REDDY, R/O INAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, W.G.DIST. REDDY, S/0 GANGI REDDY, R/O INAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, W G DIST 5.VELAGALA CHANI RAMI REDDY, S/0 LAKSHMANA RFnnv R/O INAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVArTm mTnDAl" 7.TETALI VEERA REDDY, S/0 GAVIR REDDY VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, W.G.DIST REDDY, S/0 SAMBAIAH, R/O INAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, W.G.DIST 9.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH INSPECTOR OF POLICE f R/O W.G.DIST. R/O INAPARRU THROUGH THE SUB- W.G.DIST., HIGH COURT ' IRAGAVARAM P s represented by its public prosecutor ” OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 c,rcun.s,anoes stated in the affidavit filedin sS^orfh^CtimiS Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the Judgment passed in C.C.No.75/2002 on the file of the II AddI Judl FiS Tanuku, dated 09.10.09 Class Magistrate, respondents/accused. and convict the w Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following; ORDER: Mr. Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that, according to his instructions, the parties settled out of the Court and the matter became infructuous and no further orders are required. The Sub Inspector of Police, Iragavaram Police Station filed a letter stating that on 09.12.2023, the complainant has compromised the case before the Lok Adalat against the accused nos.7,9 and 10. In view of the representation of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the letter of the concerned Station House Officer, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tanuku District, (with records if any) 2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Iragavaram Police Station, District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, Amaravathi[OUT] 4. One CC to Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section 6. Two CD Copies West Godavari West Godavari High Court of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. TK sree ✓ HIGH COURT DATED:14/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC No.35 of 2010 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS