Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194792 (ALL)

SRI RAM ALIAS JEEVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/1931/2024 · 2025-11-21

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1931 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 490 of 2023, under Sections 302 I.P.C and 4/25 Arms Act, P.S. Motipur, District- Bahraich. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that on 20.08.2023, on account of the family dispute, the daughter of the informant was attacked with a sharp weapon which resulted in her death. The post-mortem report indicates the cause of death as ante-mortem injuries and as many as 9 injuries were noticed on the body of the victim. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is in custody since 24.08.2023, having no previous criminal antecedents therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned A.G.A has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the material on record; although the nature of the injuries are severe, considering the pre-trial detention suffered by the applicant i.e more than two years; the fact that only two witnesses have been examined as also the fact that the applicant is in jail since 24.08.2023 having no criminal antecedents, therefore, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Sri Ram Alias Jeeva be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi, Anil Pandey, Kavita Yadav, Tanupriya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sri Ram Alias Jeeva .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 1931 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench