Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194789 (ALL)

PHOOLMATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME DEPTT. ) LKO.

BAIL/11159/2025 · 2025-11-17

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11159 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.206 of 2025 under Section 80(2), 85 BNS and Section 3/4 of DP Act, P.S.- Sharda Nagar, District- Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, namely, Jamuna Prasad has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 17.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10040 of 2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in the order dated 17.10.2025, ground of parity, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 06.08.2025, having no criminal history, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Phoolmati be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhupendra Veer Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Phoolmati .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home Deptt. ) Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 17, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11159 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench