GIRIJA SHANKAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO
BAIL/5099/2025 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194783 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194783 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5099 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Kaushal Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 46 of 2025, under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 126(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Shivratanganj, District Amethi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that ten unknown persons and 2 to 3 known persons had attacked the brother of the informant which resulted in substantial injuries. Injury report is on record.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the general allegations levelled against the all the persons and the fact that the applicant is aged about 55 years, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 28.4.2025 and has explained his criminal history of one case is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Girija Shankar Shukla be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pravin Singh, Anupam Bajpai, Puneet Kumar Srivastava, Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kaushal Tiwari Girija Shankar Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 5099 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench