VIRENDRA KUMAR v. SRI ASHUTOSH PANDEY, TEHSILDAR / ASSISTANT COLLECTOR TARABGANJ DISTT. GONDA
CAPL/3412/2025 · 2025-10-17
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194779 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194779 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3412 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that inadvertently, certain
facts and documents are left to be mentioned/enclosed along with the present contempt application which are necessary for proper adjudication of the present contempt application and prays for withdrawal of the same as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the relevant documents to the
learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photocopy of the same. October 17, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Nishad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Virendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) Sri Ashutosh Pandey, Tehsildar / Assistant Collector Tarabganj Distt. Gonda .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench