Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194748 (MAD)

G.Siva Prasad v. C.Venkatesan and 10 others

A/5532/2025 · 2025-11-12

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A NO. 5532 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A.No. 5532 of 2025 in C.S.No. 31 of 2023 G.Siva Prasad S/o Late N.Ganesan Old No.14, New No.31, 4th Main Road, Jawahar Nagar, Chennai - 82 Applicant(s) Vs C.Venkatesan S/o Late C.G.Chidambaram Grandson Of Late C.Govindaraj No.20/2, Thulunathamman Koil St., Agaram, Chennai -82. and 10 Others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/s.S.B.Viswanathan ORDER This application has been filed by the applicant, to permit the applicant to examine the witnesses viz. Mr.S.Kalyankumar and Mr.S.Karthikeyan as plaintiff's side witnesses. 2.According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main Suit. The Suit has been filed for recovery of money as against the respondents and the respondents / defendants were already set exparte in the main Suit. In order to examine the attesting witnesses, who were present at the time of execution of the sale agreement, the above application has been filed. Since the plaintiff's side evidence was already closed, this application is filed to reopen the plaintiff's side evidence. Other side were already set exparte. 3.Considering the above said reasons stated by the applicant that the said witnesses are https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis very essential to prove this case, and in order to give a fair chance to the applicant to prove his case, this application is allowed. 12-11-2025 (2/3) kas https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis