Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19474 (RAJ)

KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA ADOPTED SON OF SHRI NATHURAM SHARMA v. SHRI YOGANAND SON OF SHRI DAYABHANU

CR/77/2020 · 2025-08-21

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 161/2019 Kailash Adopted S/o Shri Nathuram Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o Pratapgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj) At Present Residing At H.no. 373, Vivek Vihar, New Sanganer, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Yoganand S/o Shri Dayabhanu, Aged About 38 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o Pratapgarh Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj) 2. Shivkumar S/o Shri Radheyshyam, Aged About 62 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o Pratapgarh Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj) 3. Purshottam S/o Shri Pyarelal, Aged About 47 Years, B/c Brahmin, R/o Pratapgarh Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 77/2020 Kailash Chandra Sharma Adopted Son Of Shri Nathuram Sharma, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Pratapgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.). At Present Residing At H.no. 373, Vivek Vihar, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur-302019, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Yoganand Son Of Shri Dayabhanu, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Pratapgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.). 2. Shiv Kumar Son Of Shri Radheyshyam, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Pratapgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.). 3. Purshottam Son Of Shri Pyarelal, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Pratapgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.). ----Respondents (2 of 2) [CR-161/2019] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siya Ram Sharma, Adv. Mr. Dineshjat, Adv. Ms. isha Shekhawat, Adv. Ms. Gayatri Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anukriti Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 21/08/2025 Heard. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and without interfering with the impugned orders, I dispose of these civil revision petitions with liberty to the petitioners- defendants to raise all the objections, as raised in these petitions in the written statements before the trial Court during trial. The trial court is directed to frame the issues and decide the suit filed by the plaintiffs as early as possible but not later than one year from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with Law. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Gourav/111-112