Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194736 (ALL)

HARI NARAYAN PANDEY AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/13492/2025 · 2025-11-21

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13492 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Pankaj Patel, learned for opposite parties 1 & 2 and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties 3 to 5. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "i) Issue a writ, order and direction in the nature of mandamus to commanding the opposite parties to consider and make the payment of post retiral dues and pension under 'Old Pension Scheme and paid the pension and other post retiral dues in accordance to the Old Pension Scheme to the Petitioners within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court, with all consequential benefit. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of post retiral dues and pension to the Petitioners as per judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and Others reported in 2019 (10) SCC 516 as well as Writ - A No. 8968 of 2022 decided on 17.02.2023 and Special appeal No-97 of 2021 (State of U.P. & 4 Others Versus Bhanu Pratap Sharma) decided on 09.06.2021 and Writ-A No-731 of 2024 decided on 04.11.2025 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." Learned counsel for petitioner submits that aforesaid issued has thereafter been considered and decided in writ petition No.731 of 2024, Jai Ram Sharma versus State of U.P. and others. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Vice Chancellor, Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology, District Ayodhya. In case such a representation is filed, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hanumant Lal Yadav, Om Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh Hari Narayan Pandey And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Education And Research And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) same is required to be decided in the light of aforesaid judgments in case same are applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. The petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13492 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench