SATISH KUMAR KAPOOR v. MR. B.N. DHAWAN AND 4 OTHERS
A227/6652/2025 · 2025-11-14
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6652 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with.
3. The petitioner has approached this Court with limited prayer that his application preferred under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No.13 of 1972, registered as P.A. Case No.30/2018 pending before the Prescribed Authority/Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mohanlalganj, Lucknow may be decided expeditiously.
4. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the proceedings under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No.13 of 1972 are summary nature. Several dates have been fixed and more than 7 years have lapsed, but the matter has not yet been decided. He has drawn the attention of the Court to the extracts of the order-sheet, which have been brought on record as Annexure No.2.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts as well as the extracts of the order- sheets, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the Prescribed Authority concerned to consider and decide the pending release application filed under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No.13 of 1972, registered as P.A. Case No.30/2018 as expeditiously as possible affording full opportunity of hearing to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimal Kumar, Km. Vishwa Mohini Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Satish Kumar Kapoor .....Petitioner(s) Mr. B.N. Dhawan And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the Prescribed Authority concerned provided that there is no legal impediment and the petitioner is also directed to cooperate in early hearing.
6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Prescribed Authority concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. November 14, 2025 Rakesh/- A227 No. 6652 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench