UDAY SHANKAR JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/8373/2024 · 2025-11-21
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194726 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194726 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8373 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A., today, in Court, is taken on record.
2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioner, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner do not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 21, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mithila Bakhsh Tiwari, Amar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ram Pratap Tiwari (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Uday Shankar Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench