Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194717 (ALL)

HARI RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/10924/2025 · 2025-11-21

Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10924 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The captioned writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, praying therein for the following reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties, not to get the kharanja installed over the petitioner's khasra no.179 /0.051 situated at village Harihar pur Tehsil Alapur Ambedkar Nagar in the interest of justice. (ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to get the encroachment removed from the khasra 208, the chak road and form khasra no217,the chak Nali situated at village Hariharpur Tehsil Alapur Ambedkar Nagar in the interest of justice." 3. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that the chak-marg already existed on Gata No.208, whereas at present chak-marg is being constructed on the bhumidhari land of the petitioner, i.e., Gata No.179. 4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State, on the basis of the instructions, has submitted that the chak-marg is being constructed on Gata No.208 only and there is no construction on the bhumidhari land of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Saumya Yadav, Triloki Nath Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Hari Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) the petitioner, i.e, Gata No.179. 5. In light of the aforesaid categorical stand taken by the State, nothing survives in this writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondents shall not construct the chak-marg on the bhumidhari land of the petitioner, i.e., Gata No.179. November 21, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10924 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench