VIMAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/760/2025 · 2025-10-27
Pankaj Bhatia
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194710 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194710 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 760 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.200 of 2024, under Sections 64(1), 352, 351(3) of BNSS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Jaitpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on 07.09.2024, the husband of the informant was taken on by the use of force and some noxious substance was administered to him. It was also alleged that the applicant used to harass the daughter of the informant aged about 14 years. It was also alleged that around six months ago, the applicant enticed her daughter and physical relations were formed against her consent and applied Sindoor on her forehead. 4. In the light of the aforesaid allegations, the Counsel for the applicant argues that the husband of the informant was found in excess alcoholic condition and was admitted in the hospital. In the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim did not allege the commission of rape. The tentative age of the victim is around 14 years. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kuldeep Singh, Avinash Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anuj Kumar Mishra, Ram Kalesh Vimal Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Considering the statements of the victim not alleging any penetrative sexual assault and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 14.10.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Vimal Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 27, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 760 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench