Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194696 (ALL)

KIRAN BAJPAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/9929/2025 · 2025-10-28

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9929 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the electricity supply connection has been restored to the petitioner. 3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner concurs with the said submission. 4. In the event the petitioner so desires, he may apply for a fresh connection within a period of four weeks, which would be considered by the Department in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 28, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.K. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal, Neerav Chitravanshi (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Kiran Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench