DEENA NATH v. STATE OF U.P THRU PRIN SECY RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO and ORS
WRIA/30312/2017 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194676 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194676 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 30312 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to record. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad Maurya, Ninnie Shrivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Deena Nath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru Prin Secy Rural Development Lko And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench