HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1064 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. According to Ms. Isha Mittal, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State she has written instructions to the effect that proceedings under Section 124 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have been initiated and are pending. 3. In view of the above, without prejudice to rights, if any, of the respondent No.6 whether in respect of the order dated 13.06.2022 passed under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in Case No.01947 of 2018 or otherwise, we dispose of this petition in terms of the statement made by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State as we see no reason to proceed any further, the proceedings having already been drawn under the statute. October 10, 2025 -Piyush- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Dhirendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench