Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19467 (RAJ)

MANISH GUPTA S/O SHRI BAL KISHAN GUPTA v. BEAWAR URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

WMAP/130/2025 · 2025-07-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No.130/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2225/2025 Manish Gupta S/o Shri Bal Kishan Gupta, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 26/45, Agrasen Nagar, Delwara Road, Beawar Rajasthan- 305091 ----Petitioner/Non-applicant Versus 1. Beawar Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Through Its Chairman, Headquarters At Shah Market, Pali Bazar, Beawar Rajasthan- 305091. 2. Chairman, Beawar Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Headquarters At Shah Market, Pali Bazar, Beawar Rajasthan- 305091 ----Respondents/Applicant For Applicants/ respondents : Mr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma For Non-applicant/ petitioner : Mr. Arihant Samdaria JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/07/2025 1. The instant misc. application has been submitted seeking extension of time for completion of inquiry against the non- applicant/petitioner pursuant to the order dated 12.02.2025. 2. Counsel for the applicants/respondents submits that while deciding the writ petition submitted by the non- applicant/petitioner, this Court vide order dated 12.02.2025 has directed the applicants-respondents to conclude the pending inquiry within a period of three months. Counsel (2 of 2) [WMAP-130/2025] submits that an Enquiry Officer was appointed vide order dated 01.03.2025 and notice was issued to the non- applicant/petitioner on 04.03.2025 for his appearance before the Enquiry Officer, whereas the non-applicant/petitioner sought time to submit detailed reply to the charge-sheet and application in this regard was submitted on 15.04.2025 and thereafter, a detailed reply has been submitted, but in the meantime, the time fixed by this Court has expired, therefore, some reasonable time be granted for completion of enquiry against the non-applicant/petitioner. 3. Counsel for the non-applicant/petitioner has no objection. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the applicants-respondents and the reasons stated in the application, the same stands allowed. 5. Two months’ further time is granted to the applicants- respondents to conclude the pending enquiry against the non- applicant/petitioner. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/109