HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10240 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent in deciding the application dated 02.04.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 2/ District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the Gram Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Subash Chandra Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Panchayat. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10240 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench