HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8891 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking following main relief(s):- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the order dated 20.5.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Hardoi in complaint case no.27321/2022 (Liyakat Ali Vs Akhilesh Savita & Others) as well as quash of the proceedings of complaint case no.27321/2022, contained as Annexure No. 1 to the petition." 3. On 16.10.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned AGA for the State- respondents no.1 and 2 and perused the record. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that there is chance of mediation by the parties. 3. Record reveals that Cheque of Rs. 3,00,000/- was advanced in favour of applicant no.1, which has been en-cashed by him, however, the sale deed could not be executed. The offence is trivial and may be settled by mediation. 4. The applicant no.1 will bring bank draft of Rs. 50,000- in the name of Senior Registrar of this Court. 5. List on 29.10.2025. On that date the opposite party no.3 will appear before this Court to explore the possibility of mediation. The applicant no.1 will also appear in person with the bank draft of Rs. 50,000/- in the name of Senior Registrar of this Court. 6. Till the next date of listing, operation of the order dated 20.5.2025, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Hardoi, as well as the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2731 of 2022, shall remain stayed. 7. In case of non compliance of the order, the benefit of this order shall not be available to the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akhilesh Kumar Savita And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 8. Learned AGA will inform the opposite party no. 3 through S.H.O. concerned." 4. Today, when the case was called out, Sri Pankaj Gupta, the learned counsel for the applicants, at the very outset, says that he does not want to press the instant application and it may accordingly be dismissed as not pressed. 5. The aforesaid has not been opposed. 6. In view of the above, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed. November 14, 2025 Arun/- A482 No. 8891 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench